There is some silly language in the air, 'having their (our) bluff called' and similar terminology, none of which will be helpful to the working out of the process, there needs must be scrupulous honesty about numbers, of laity rather than clergy, who might wish, or be able to make the move, and the implications of that for new structures.
There will now need to be a period of clear headed, and charitable discussion and opinion seeking.
On a more personal note, the recent events have meant that I have been much in contact with King's College London, seeking to change the subject of my final thesis for the KCL D.Min. I had started to write on the rule of SSC and of the pattern of priesthood that the rule seeks to form. After discussion I concluded that SSC will be found to be in a melting pot of uncertain outcome, and I, like all brethren would be part of that process. Thus the situation is not secure enough for the study I had planned.Dr. Luke Bretherton and Prof McGrath of KCL have been splendid in their help and counsel, under their careful guidance I am submitting a new proposal on Mysticism as an essential to the grammar of the Church, with special reference to S. Bernadette, S. Therese of Lisieux and S. Gemma Galgani. Well, I always like hanging out with women mystics, so it will be three years in good company.






